Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY: Antitrust agencies urge reform of Virginia Certificate-of-Need Laws for health care facilities
    • ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS NEWS: Bridgestone to acquire Pep Boys for $835M
    • ADVERTISING—S.D. Cal.: Claims that MillerCoors misrepresented Blue Moon beer as “craft beer” fail
    • AGENCY NEWS: FTC, international partners launch information-sharing system
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Baer highlights role, purpose of antitrust enforcement for consumers
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: CMA investigation finds lack of competitive pressure in retail banking market
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: High Court asked to consider conspiracy to fix text messaging prices
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Volkswagen named in yet another class action for “Dieselgate” scandal
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Operator of advance fee recovery telemarketing scheme fined $2.8M
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—S.D. Ind: Transfer of venue granted in claims by Noble Roman’s franchisor
    • LAW FIRM NEWS: Privacy attorney Janine Bowen joins LeClairRyan
    • PRIVACY—3d Cir.: Yahoo!’s text notifications could lead to $13.9M judgment
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—Ohio App.: Amazon, Intuit consumer must arbitrate deceptive practices claim
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Operator of advance fee recovery telemarketing scheme fined $2.8M, (Oct 26, 2015)

    Organizations Mentioned:Consumer Collection Advocates, Corp.

    By Greg Hammond, J.D.

    The operator of a telemarketing advance fee recovery scheme that bilked $1.3 million from consumers who had already lost money to timeshare resale and investment scams was ordered to pay over $2.8 million. The federal district court in Fort Lauderdal ...

    By Greg Hammond, J.D.

    The operator of a telemarketing advance fee recovery scheme that bilked $1.3 million from consumers who had already lost money to timeshare resale and investment scams was ordered to pay over $2.8 million. The federal district court in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, also issued a final order, prohibiting the telemarketer from participating in telemarketing or otherwise violating the Telephone Sales Rule (TSR) (FTC v. Consumer Collection Advocates, Corp., File No. 142 3082, Dkt. 0:14-cv-62491-BB).

    According to the Commission’s complaint, Consumer Collection Advocates, Corp. called consumers and falsely guaranteed that for an up-front fee—typically 20 percent of the amount lost in timeshare resale or investment scams—Consumer Collection would recover substantial amounts of money for them within 30 to 180 days. Consumers were sent a contract and power of attorney to sign and return with the up-front payment ranging from hundreds to as much as $10,000. Those who did not agree to buy Consumer Collection’s services received repeated calls pressuring them to sign up. Once consumers paid for the recovery service, however, they stopped hearing from Consumer Collection. In addition, consumers who attempted to call to obtain a status on their recovery were told their case was being worked on, but few, if any, consumers received any money, the complaint alleged.

    A stipulated preliminary injunction was entered in November 2011 prohibiting Consumer Collection from misrepresenting that consumers who buy their services will recover, or are highly likely to recover, a substantial portion of money that they have lost to telemarketers, typically within 30 to 180 days. In addition, Consumer Collection was barred from violating the TSR and from selling or otherwise benefitting from customers’ personal information.

    Summary judgment was granted in favor of the Commission in early September 2015, and the federal district court in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, has now entered its final order of permanent injunction and monetary judgment against Consumer Collection and its owner. According to the final order, Consumer Collection is permanently restrained from participating in telemarketing; misrepresenting or assisting others in misrepresenting any fact material to consumers concerning any good or service; and from attempting to collect or collecting payment for any recovery service, and from selling, assigning, or transferring any right to collect payment for any recovery service. An over $2.8 million judgment was also entered against Consumer Collection. The money recovered by the Commission will be used as equitable relief, including consumer redress.

    Companies: Consumer Collection Advocates, Corp.

    News: ConsumerProtection FederalTradeCommissionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use