Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY— High Court to consider preemption of state antitrust law claims against gas companies
    • ADVERTISING NEWS: L’Oréal settles anti-aging false advertising charges
    • ADVERTISING—E.D.N.Y.: Consumer sufficiently alleged deceptive claims about hard drive speed
    • ADVERTISING—S.D.N.Y.: Deceptive practices claims based on Staples Protection Plan fail
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Actavis, Forest Laboratories to divest four generics to settle FTC action
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Propane exchange tank distributors allegedly conspired to fix tank fill levels
    • ANTITRUST—D.N.J.: Limited injunction imposed on Avaya in PBX dispute
    • ANTITRUST—E.D. Tenn.: Attorney fees of $24M awarded in Skelaxin reverse payment suit
    • ANTITRUST—Fed. Cir.: Jury finding of no antitrust violation in patent and trademark filings upheld
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: FTC claims T-Mobile placed bogus charges on customer phone bills
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: FTC obtains injunction against collection of phony payday loan debts
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—W.D. Pa.: Dunkin’ Donuts not liable for terminating supply plan
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES NEWS: High Court lets stand California UCL claim based on Truth in Savings Act
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: FTC obtains injunction against collection of phony payday loan debts, (Jul 1, 2014)

    Organizations Mentioned:Bureau of Consumer Protection | Federal Trade Commission | WSA, LLC | Williams, Scott & Associates, LLC

    By Linda O’Brien, J.D., LL.M.

    The FTC announced today that a federal district court has stopped a debt collection operation from using deception and threats to collect $3.5 million in phantom payday loan debts that consumers didn’t owe pending trial. The court previously o ...

    By Linda O’Brien, J.D., LL.M.

    The FTC announced today that a federal district court has stopped a debt collection operation from using deception and threats to collect $3.5 million in phantom payday loan debts that consumers didn’t owe pending trial. The court previously ordered the defendants’ assets frozen to preserve the possibility that they could be used to provide redress to consumers, and appointed a receiver. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division. On May 28, 2014 the court granted the FTC’s request for a temporary restraining order and granted the FTC’s request for a preliminary injunction on June 19, 2014.

    According to its complaint filed May 27, 2014 (FTC v. Williams, Scott & Associates, LLC, Docket No. 1:14-cv-1599, File No. 132-3246), the FTC charged that Georgia resident John Williams and two companies he controls used a variety of false threats to bully consumers nationwide into paying supposed payday loan debts. Williams, Williams, Scott & Associates, LLC, and WSA, LLC falsely claimed to be affiliated with federal and state agents, investigators, members of a government fraud task force, and other law enforcement agencies, and pretended to be a law firm. The defendants also allegedly told consumers their drivers’ licenses were going to be revoked, and that they were criminals facing imminent arrest and imprisonment.

    The FTC complaint stated that many consumers the defendants contacted had inquired about a payday loan online at one time, and submitted contact information, which the defendants later obtained. The FTC alleged that the defendants’ tactics violated the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. In addition to the deception and false threats, the defendants violated federal law by telling consumers’ family members, employers, and co-workers about the debt; failing to identify themselves as debt collectors; using profanity; making repeated inconvenient or prohibited calls; failing to provide information in writing about the debt; and making unauthorized withdrawals from consumers’ bank accounts.

    “Many consumers in this case were victimized twice,” said Jessica Rich, Director of the Federal Trade Commission’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “First when they inquired about payday loans online and their personal information was not properly safeguarded, and later, when they were harassed and intimidated by these defendants, to whom they didn’t owe any money.”

    The Commission vote authorizing the staff to file the complaint was 5-0.

    Companies: Williams, Scott & Associates, LLC; WSA, LLC

    News: ConsumerProtection FederalTradeCommissionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use