Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—DColo: Proposed U.S. Consent Decree Resolving Allegations of Collusion for Mineral Rights Leases Rejected
    • ANTITRUST—JPML: Antitrust Suits Against Blue Cross Blue Shield, Plans Centralized
    • ANTITRUST—WDWash: T-Mobile Must Await Results of Arbitration on Former Dealers’ Fraud and Antitrust Claims Before Bringing Suit on Personal Guaranty Agreements
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Federal District Court Shuts Down Debt Relief Operation Following FTC Complaint
    • PRIVACY NEWS: Location Privacy Protection Bill Approved by Senate Judiciary Committee
    • RICO—DNJ: RICO Claims over Alleged Concealment of Asbestos Evidence Dismissed
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—EDPa: Fear of Foreclosure Precluded Claim of Justifiable Reliance on Deceptive Mortgage Loan Agreement Terms
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—TexAppCt: Financial Holding Company Knowingly Misrepresented Foreclosure Sales Proceedings
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Federal District Court Shuts Down Debt Relief Operation Following FTC Complaint, (Dec 14, 2012)

    The FTC on December 13 announced that the federal district court in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, has issued a restraining order halting a debt relief scheme pursuant to an FTC complaint (FTC v. Southeast Trust LLC, FTC File No. 1223079, Case No. 12-cv-6 ...

    The FTC on December 13 announced that the federal district court in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, has issued a restraining order halting a debt relief scheme pursuant to an FTC complaint (FTC v. Southeast Trust LLC, FTC File No. 1223079, Case No. 12-cv-62441). The order freezes assets of the debt relief company and its principal, grants access to the company’s premises, and provides for expedited discovery, among other relief.

    The FTC’s complaint alleged that the operation would place robocalls to consumers claiming to be a non-profit organization that helped consumers with debt problems. The calls would allegedly promise single monthly payments with low interest rates, and that consumers would dispose of their debt in three to five years. The operation also advertised through websites including southeasttrust.com and thedebtschool.com.

    The FTC alleged that, despite charging advance fees of $250 to $400, the company did not provide any services to consumers. Those responding to the calls or advertisements would be routed to telemarketers posing as “certified credit counselors,” who would ask consumers to provide sensitive information such as bank account numbers. The FTC alleged that the company would frequently debit the consumers’ accounts without their authorization.

    The FTC alleged that the conduct of the company and its principal violated the FTC Act and the Commission’s Telemarketing Sales Rule. Its complaint seeks injunctive relief, rescission or reformation of contracts, restitution, the refund of monies paid, disgorgement of ill-gotten monies, and other equitable relief.

    News: ConsumerProtection FederalTradeCommissionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use