Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—N.D. Cal.: Capacitor price fixing claims may proceed under California law, not 31 other states’ laws
    • ADVERTISING—1st Cir.: Footwear maker’s settlement of health benefit misrepresentation claims upheld
    • ADVERTISING—S.D. Cal.: Daily vitamin producer continues to face false representation claims
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: AAI challenges heightened pleading standards in pay-for-delay litigation
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Auto parts makers charged in occupant safety systems price fixing suit
    • ANTITRUST—D. Colo.: Monopolization counterclaims partially construed as recoupment counterclaims
    • ANTITRUST—N.D. Ga.: FTC could not discover information underlying reverse payment settlement negotiations
    • ANTITRUST—N.D. Ohio.: Objector fails to disqualify class counsel in polyurethane foam price fixing suit
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Biennial report on Do Not Call Registry issued to Congress
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—E. D. Mich.: Former Domino’s franchisees enjoined from operating new pizza business at former store
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES NEWS: High Court urged to rule that Federal Circuit lacked jurisdiction in patent demand-letter dispute
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Biennial report on Do Not Call Registry issued to Congress, (Jan 4, 2016)

    By Michael Menzhuber, J.D., LL.M.

    The FTC has issued to Congress its biennial report on the use of the Do Not Call Registry by both consumers and businesses over the past two years. The Registry exists to provide consumers with a choice regarding whether or not to receive telemarketi ...

    By Michael Menzhuber, J.D., LL.M.

    The FTC has issued to Congress its biennial report on the use of the Do Not Call Registry by both consumers and businesses over the past two years. The Registry exists to provide consumers with a choice regarding whether or not to receive telemarketing calls.

    This year’s report, issued in compliance with the Do Not Call Registry Fee Extension Act, addresses: (1) the impact of the five-year re-registration requirement which was eliminated in 2007; (2) how the FTC is responding to new technologies that have increased the number of illegal telemarketing calls made to numbers on the Registry; (3) issues regarding number portability and abandoned telephone numbers; and (4) the impact of the established business relationship exception on consumers and businesses.

    As of September 30, 2015, the Registry had more than 222 million active registrations. This was an increase of more than 4.9 million registrations from the previous fiscal year (FY).

    In FY 2015:

    • 2,504 business and other entities paid Registry access fees, totaling more than $13.3 million; and

    • 20,596 entities accessed the Registry without paying a fee because they access five or fewer area codes or are a charity.

    Similar numbers of entities utilized the Registry in FY 2014 and paid access fees of more than $13.5 million.

    News: ConsumerProtection FederalTradeCommissionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use