Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—Cal. App.: Crane operator training facility adequately stated Cartwright Act claim against crane operator certification administrator
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC seeks public comments on additional Service Corporation International application to sell funeral assets
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC staff comments on Missouri House bill to change physician supervision requirements for advanced practice nurses
    • ANTITRUST—Del. Sup. Ct.: Court confirms general validity of fee-shifting provisions in bylaws
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: American Apparel settles FTC charge it falsely claimed to comply with international Safe Harbor privacy framework
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—D. Ariz.: Former franchisee fails to state consumer fraud claims against pizza restaurant franchisor
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—M.D. N.C.: Texas franchisee was not subject to jurisdiction in North Carolina
    • PRIVACY NEWS: FTC Chairwoman renews call for Congress to act on data breach legislation
    • PRIVACY—9th Cir.: District court erred in dismissing breach of contract and fraud claims against Facebook
    • PRIVACY—9th Cir.: Wiretap Act and Stored Communications Act claims against Zynga and Facebook failed
    • PRIVACY—W.D. Wash.: Settlement approved in TCPA class action against Best Buy
    • RICO—W.D. Mo.: RICO claims against cleaning business franchisor and others dismissed for failure to state a claim
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: American Apparel settles FTC charge it falsely claimed to comply with international Safe Harbor privacy framework, (May 9, 2014)

    Organizations Mentioned:American Apparel, Inc. | Bureau of Consumer Protection | Federal Trade Commission | U.S. Department of Commerce

    The FTC announced today that clothing manufacturer American Apparel, Inc., has agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that it falsely claimed it was abiding by an international privacy framework known as the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor that enable ...

    The FTC announced today that clothing manufacturer American Apparel, Inc., has agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that it falsely claimed it was abiding by an international privacy framework known as the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor that enables U.S. companies to transfer consumer data from the European Union to the United States in compliance with EU law.

    “The FTC is committed to making sure that when companies claim they’re participating in the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Framework, they’re abiding by the terms of the program,” said Jessica Rich, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection.

    According to the FTC’s complaint, the Los Angeles-based company deceptively claimed it held current certifications under the U.S.-EU and U.S.-Swiss Safe Harbor frameworks. The Safe Harbor frameworks are voluntary programs administered by the U.S. Department of Commerce in consultation with the European Commission and Switzerland.

    To participate, a company must self-certify annually to the Department of Commerce that it complies with the seven privacy principles required to meet the EU’s adequacy standard: notice, choice, onward transfer, security, data integrity, access, and enforcement.

    The FTC complaint charges American Apparel with representing, through statements in its privacy policy, that the company held current Safe Harbor certifications, even though it had allowed its certifications to lapse. The Commission alleged that this conduct violated Section 5 of the FTC Act. However, this does not necessarily mean that the company committed any substantive violations of the privacy principles of the Safe Harbor frameworks.

    Under the proposed settlement agreement, American Apparel is prohibited from misrepresenting the extent to which it participates in any privacy or data security program sponsored by the government or any other self-regulatory or standard-setting organization.

    The Commission vote to accept the consent order for public comment was 4-0-1, with Commissioner McSweeny not participating.

    Companies: American Apparel, Inc.

    News: ConsumerProtection Privacy FederalTradeCommissionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use