Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • ‘Clean’ Reauthorization of Surveillance Law Wins Another Key Backer
    • Concerns About Sabotage Led to Anthropic’s Security Risk Designation, Court Told
    • House Hearing to Feature Testimony From CISA Chief on Impact of DHS Shutdown
    • Legislation to Restrict Chinese Equipment in Telecom Networks Advances in Arizona
    • Meta’s Plans for Facial Recognition Tech in Smartglasses Raise Questions, Senators Say
    • Requests for Personal Data Can Be Regarded as Abusive, EU Court Rules
    • Revisions Sought to FTC’s COPPA Age Verification Enforcement Approach
    • Risks From Agentic AI Outlined by Hong Kong Privacy Regulator
    • STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES—Legal Experts Discuss Scaling AI in Webinar on Wolters Kluwer 2026 Future Ready Lawyer Survey
    • Senate Committee to Mark Up Satellite Cybersecurity Bills
    • Transparency Obligations Under GDPR Will Be 2026 Focus of EU Privacy Authorities
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Cybersecurity Policy Report, Concerns About Sabotage Led to Anthropic’s Security Risk Designation, Court Told, (Mar 19, 2026)

    By Tom Leithauser

    Concerns that Anthropic might try to sabotage federal government systems led the Trump administration to cancel Anthropic’s contract with the Department of Defense and designate the artificial intelligence company as a security risk, according ...

    By Tom Leithauser

    Concerns that Anthropic might try to sabotage federal government systems led the Trump administration to cancel Anthropic’s contract with the Department of Defense and designate the artificial intelligence company as a security risk, according to court filings.

    Amid a contract dispute between Anthropic and DoD, the department became worried that “an AI model used in national security systems would be sabotaged by a hostile and untrustworthy corporate owner,” the administration told the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

    Anthropic has asked the court for a temporary restraining order to reverse the penalties imposed on it by the government after the company insisted that DoD not use its AI technology for mass domestic surveillance or autonomous weapons (CPR, March 16).

    In its response to Anthropic’s lawsuit, the Trump administration said it had the authority to ban the company from receiving government contracts and did so to protect government operations (Anthropic PBC v. U.S. Department of War, et al., No. 3:26-cv-01996 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2026)).

    “Early this year, the Secretary of War directed the Department of War (‘DoW’ or ‘Department’) to incorporate into any AI service contracts a provision that permits DoW to use the technology for any lawful purpose,” the government noted.

    “If it were any other way, an AI provider might gain influence over how DoW conducts operations and which missions it chooses. Anthropic, whose Claude AI model is embedded in DoW’s unclassified and classified systems, refused to accept the term during new contract negotiations, citing its Usage Policy that imposes various limitations on the use of Claude,” it told the court.

    “And throughout the negotiations, Anthropic’s behavior more generally caused the Department to question whether Anthropic represented a trusted partner with whom the Department was willing to contract in this highly sensitive area,” it added.

    “AI systems are acutely vulnerable to manipulation, and Anthropic could attempt to disable its technology or preemptively alter the behavior of its model either before or during ongoing warfighting operations, if Anthropic—in its discretion—feels that its corporate ‘red lines’ are being crossed. DoW deemed that an unacceptable risk to national security,” the government said.

    District Judge Rita Lin has scheduled a March 24 hearing on Anthropic’s request for a restraining order.

    News: FederalLegislation LitigationEnforcement DataPrivacy AINews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use