Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • PATENT—Fed. Cir.: Patents not infringed where ANDA proposes a use not covered by the patents
    • BLOG TRACKER—Noteworthy blog posts and other commentary
    • COPYRIGHT—D.N.J.: Mixed results for movie studios seeking to amend complaint against telecom service provider
    • COPYRIGHT—E.D. Mich.: Order and sequence of steps in a user interface are driven by function and therefore not protectible, a court reaffirms
    • PATENT—D. Minn.: Post-trial motions denied in text message tracking patent dispute
    • PATENT—W.D. Tex.: Google Maps did not infringe mobile device location patent as a matter of law
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    IP Law Daily, BLOG TRACKER—Noteworthy blog posts and other commentary, (Dec 7, 2023)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz | Haug Partners LLP | Haynes Boone LLP | Hogan Lovells | McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP | Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Organizations Mentioned:Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP | Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz, PC | Hogan Lovells, LLP | McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff, LLP | Santa Clara University | University of Missouri | Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC

    By WK Editorial Staff

    The week’s most insightful, intriguing, or entertaining blog posts regarding intellectual property issues.

    • Patently-O, VLSI’s $2.2b Infringement Verdict Rejected by Federal Circuit, by Dennis Crouch (University of Missouri School of Law)

    • Artificial Intelligence Law Advisor, Appreciable or De Minimis: That Is the AI Question, by Adrian F. Vallens, Farrah Vazquez, and Nicolas A. Jampol

    • JD Supra, Purdue v. Collegium: Upholding the Board’s Authority to Issue a Final Written Decision Even After the Statutory Deadline Has Passed, by Chinmay Bagwe and Kaitlin Abrams Farrell

    • IP Watchdog, Takeaways from PTAB’s Precedential Decision on Prior Art Analysis for Post-AIA Patents, by David McCombs, Eugene Goryunov, and Matthew Beck

    • Rebecca Tushnet’s 43(B)log, Dastar bars false marking claims brought under Lanham Act (dubitante), by Rebecca Tushnet (Harvard Law School)

    • Technology & Marketing Law Blog, Roblox Sanctioned for SAD Scheme Abuse–Roblox v. Schedule A Defendants, by Eric Goldman (Santa Clara University School of Law)

    • Mondaq, Two Courts, Two Ad Campaigns, And Copyright's Idea-Expression Dichotomy, by Brian G. Murphy

    • The Illusion of More, The Generative AI Fair Use Defense Under Google Books, by David Newhoff

    • Engage, Beijing Internet Court grants copyright protection for AI artworks, but copyrightability debate of AI-generated output continues, by Zhen Feng

    • Patent Docs, Jager Pro, Inc. v. W-W Manufacturing Co. (Fed. Cir. 2023), by Kevin E. Noonan

    • TTABlog, CAFC Upholds TTAB's Judgment on the Pleadings Based on Dissimilarity of Marks in VERITÉ Opposition, by John Welch

    Attorneys: Adrian F. Vallens, Farrah Vazquez and Nicolas A. Jampol (Davis Wright Tremaine LLP). Chinmay Bagwe and Kaitlin Abrams Farrell (Haug Partners LLP). David McCombs and Eugene Goryunov (Haynes Boone LLP). Brian G. Murphy (Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz). Zhen Feng (Hogan Lovells). Kevin E. Noonan (McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP). John L. Welch (Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.).

    News: AINews Copyright Patent TechnologyInternet Trademark

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use