Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations
    • ANTITRUST—D.N.J.: Revlimid buyers’ pay-for-delay antitrust claims survive drugmakers’ motion to dismiss
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC settles suit against national alcoholic beverage distributor Southern Glazer’s
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • ANTITRUST—S.D. Fla.: Employee who successfully alleged FEMA prime contractor wage restraints failed to allege antitrust conspiracy
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • ANTITRUST—S.D.N.Y.: Suit by pro tennis players against the ATP Tour and the WTA Tour can proceed
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: FTC files suit against Lens.com over fees consumers couldn’t see
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—S.D. Tex.: OsteoStrong® physical fitness franchisee awarded damages in franchise dispute
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST—S.D. Fla.: Employee who successfully alleged FEMA prime contractor wage restraints failed to allege antitrust conspiracy, (Oct 5, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Carlton Fields, P.A. | Pollard PLLC
    Organizations Mentioned:Fluor Federal Services, Inc.

    By Justin Marcus Smith, J.D.

    The employee suffered dismissal by default on a motion to dismiss because he failed to engage with the federal contractors’ arguments that he failed to allege an agreement among them.

    An employee who brought a putative no-poach wage-suppression ...

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use