Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations
    • ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS—S.D.N.Y.: Epogee acquisition challenge dismissed with prejudice for market definition and harm to competition implausibilities
    • ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS NEWS: Justice Department offers comments on Vistra’s acquisition of Cogentrix
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Tire manufacturers file appellate brief critical of plus factors cited in dismissed Sherman Act complaint
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • ANTITRUST—9th Cir.: Ninth Circuit upholds attorney fees sanctions in Axon antitrust suit
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Payment processor will pay $600K to settle FTC allegations
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • LAW FIRM NEWS: Firms bolster antitrust teams with seasoned lawyers
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST NEWS: Tire manufacturers file appellate brief critical of plus factors cited in dismissed Sherman Act complaint, (Nov 3, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati | Wolf, Haldenstein, Adler, Freeman & Herz
    Organizations Mentioned:Continental Aktiengesellschaft

    By Justin Marcus Smith, J.D.

    The tire manufacturers emphasized that the plaintiffs themselves pointed to a radical market disruption that provided a rational, unilateral business reason for independent price increases.

    Defendant tire manufacturers filed an appellate brief urging ...

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use