Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—D. Nev.: Las Vegas liquor ordinance not subject to the Sherman Act
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: EC Vice President Almunia speaks at last European Competition Day
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: EC approves Liberty Global’s acquisition of Dutch cable TV operator Ziggo
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: EC conducts unannounced inspections of biofuel companies, cites anticompetitive concerns
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Supreme Court to hear arguments on state dental board’s right to immunity
    • LAW FIRM NEWS: Hausfeld welcomes former federal Judge Walter DeKalb Kelley to antitrust practice
    • MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS NEWS: FAQs outline how Fed, Antitrust Division analyze bank mergers, acquisitions
    • RICO—W.D. Wash.: Vexatious plaintiffs sanctioned $10K for frivolous, harassing claims
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—Cal. App.: Potential defendant in CLRA claim could not maintain declaratory action after receipt of statutory notice
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST NEWS: Supreme Court to hear arguments on state dental board’s right to immunity, (Oct 10, 2014)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Jones Day | Sidley Austin LLP
    Organizations Mentioned:American Dental Association | American Medical Association | Jones Day, LLP | North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners | Sidley Austin, LLP

    The U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Tuesday, October 14, on whether the North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners should be considered a “private” actor for purposes of the state action immunity doctrine, because the ma ...

    The U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Tuesday, October 14, on whether the North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners should be considered a “private” actor for purposes of the state action immunity doctrine, because the majority of its board members are market participants elected by other market participants. The Court will be reviewing a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia (717 F.3d 359, 2013-1 Trade Cases ¶78,406), which found in favor of the FTC’s determination that the Board was not immune for excluding non-dentist providers from the market for teeth whitening services in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act (North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC, Case No. 13-534).

    In its petition for certiorari, the Board challenges the appellate court’s “unprecedented holding,” that the Board is a “private” actor “that must satisfy the ‘active supervision’ requirement, simply because, pursuant to state law, a majority of the Board’s members are also market participants who are elected to their official positions by other market participants.” The Supreme Court granted certiorari on March 3, 2014.

    Attorneys: Glen D. Nager (Jones Day) for North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners. Donald B. Verrilli Jr., Solicitor General, for FTC. Jack R. Bierig (Sidley Austin LLP) for American Dental Association and American Medical Association.

    Companies: North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners; American Dental Association; American Medical Association

    News: Antitrust FederalTradeCommissionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use