Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY: Standard-essential patent holders’ injunctive relief actions could be unlawful, EC court
    • ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS NEWS: FTC approves Panasonic’s application to sell assets used to manufacture sub-C NiMH batteries
    • ADVERTISING NEWS: New York AG settles deceptive advertising claims against car dealerships
    • ADVERTISING—N.D. Cal.: Inclusion of ‘poisonous’ artificial trans-fats may be unfair business practice
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Collectible authentication company allegedly colludes to reject competing dealer’s memorabilia
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Japan Fair Trade Commission requests comments on amendment to “Guidelines for the Use of Intellectual Property under the Antimonopoly Act”
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Protections for antitrust whistleblowers advance in Senate
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Qualcomm under investigation by EC for possible abuse of market position
    • BLOG TRACKER—Noteworthy blog posts and other commentary
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—E.D.N.Y.: Failure to request interest on delinquent account did not waive LoJack’s right to recovery
    • LAW FIRM NEWS: Antitrust, pharmaceutical attorney Robin Adelstein joins Norton Rose Fulbright
    • RICO—8th Cir.: Lack of racketeering activity clears construction companies from liability
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES NEWS: Pet food maker charged with deceptively advertising Beggin’ dog treats as made primarily with real bacon
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST NEWS: Japan Fair Trade Commission requests comments on amendment to “Guidelines for the Use of Intellectual Property under the Antimonopoly Act”, (Jul 16, 2015)

    By Jody Coultas, J.D.

    The Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC) has stipulated “Guidelines for the Use of Intellectual Property under the Antimonopoly Act” and “Guidelines on Standardization and Patent Pool Arrangements” to address issues related ...

    By Jody Coultas, J.D.

    The Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC) has stipulated “Guidelines for the Use of Intellectual Property under the Antimonopoly Act” and “Guidelines on Standardization and Patent Pool Arrangements” to address issues related to essential patents. In industries experiencing remarkable technological innovation, such as the information technology sector, those concerned often set standards jointly on the methods of information transmission and connection among different models in order for rapid launch and expansion of the market for new products. In some cases, holders of patents essential for implementation of the functions and effects prescribed in the standards claim for injunctions against those who use such essential patent inside and outside of Japan.

    However, JFTC found that the guidelines have limited descriptions about the acts found to constitute an exercise of right on its face and the Antimonopoly Act does not put forth any principles regarding the practice described above.

    After conducting a survey on the issues related to essential patents, JFTC drafted the partial amendment of the “Guidelines for the Use of Intellectual Property under the Antimonopoly Act.” JFTC seeks public comments from interested parties.

    Comments in Japanese may be emailed, faxed, or sent by mail to the JFTC no later than 18:00 (JST), August 6, 2015.

    News: Antitrust

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use