Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Justice Department settles info sharing and algorithmic coordination claims against landlord
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC, states settle collusion claims against Havas Media Group
    • ANTITRUST—E.D. Pa.: Dozens of BCBS entities obtain dismissal of TranS1 spinal fusion antitrust complaint
    • ANTITRUST—M.D.N.C.: NCAA tennis prize-money class action settlement approved
    • ANTITRUST—S.D.N.Y.: Live Nation/Ticketmaster consumer cases proceed to arbitration
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Hopper agrees to $35 million settlement with FTC over concealed booking fees
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC, states settle collusion claims against Havas Media Group, (Jul 7, 2026)

    Organizations Mentioned:Havas Media Group U.S. LLC

    By WK Editorial Staff

    The advertising agency allegedly colluded as part of the “big Six” group to demonetize certain political viewpoints.

    The FTC announced that advertising agency Havas Media Group USA LLC (Havas) has agreed to a proposed FTC order to resolv ...

    By WK Editorial Staff

    The advertising agency allegedly colluded as part of the “big Six” group to demonetize certain political viewpoints.

    The FTC announced that advertising agency Havas Media Group USA LLC (Havas) has agreed to a proposed FTC order to resolve allegations brought by the agency and a coalition of states that it engaged in unlawful collusion that led to the demonetization of disfavored political viewpoints. The complaint against Havas filed in the federal district court in Fort Worth, Texas, follows similar allegations brought against major U.S. advertising agencies WPP, Publicis and Dentsu by the FTC in April 2026. The proposed settlement with Havas is similar to settlement orders finalized with WPP, Publicis, Dentsu and Omnicom/IPG (FTC v. Havas Media Group USA LLC, No. 4:26-cv-00469-P (N.D. Tex. Jul. 7, 2026)).

    As alleged in the latest complaint against Havas and in the April 2026 complaint, the advertising agencies, known as the “Big Six,” unlawfully colluded to impose common “brand safety” standards across the digital advertising industry. These “brand safety” standards violated the antitrust laws by insulating the agencies from competition, according to the FTC’s complaint. The FTC resolved similar issues involving Omnicom and IPG in an order related to a proposed merger settlement in September 2025. Havas is now the final member of the Big Six subject to an order resolving allegations of unlawful collusion.

    If approved by a federal judge, the proposed order prohibits Havas from entering into agreements that would set common brand safety standards or restrict advertising based on biased and politically motivated criteria.

    The Case is No. 4:26-cv-00469-P.

    Attorneys: James Uthmeier, Office of the Attorney General, for the State of Florida. Theodore E. Rokita, Office of the Attorney General, for the State of Indiana. Brenna Bird, Office of the Attorney General, for the State of Iowa.

    Companies: Havas Media Group U.S. LLC

    News: Antitrust ConsumerProtection FederalTradeCommissionNews TexasNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use