Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—FTC Chair defends antitrust involvement in standard setting disputes, launches PAE study
    • ADVERTISING—N.D. Cal.: Decision imposing CAN-SPAM and CFAA liability for spamming Facebook users and scraping Facebook data not reconsidered
    • ADVERTISING—N.D. Cal.: “Made with real fruit” not a deceptive description of cookies containing fruit puree
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Actavis settles FTC charges that its proposed $8.5 billion acquisition of Warner Chilcott would be anticompetitive
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: EC’s Almunia discloses Samsung commitments to address abuse of dominance concerns
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC seeks comment on Polypore’s application to divest Microporous
    • ANTITRUST—E.D. Ky.: Antitrust claims against NCAA fail because bylaw was not commercial
    • ANTITRUST—N.D. Cal.: Thomson Consumer Electronics wins dismissal from cathode ray tube litigation
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—S.D. Cal.: California Franchise Investment Law claim fails
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—D. Colo.: Grocery customers stated valid Colorado Consumer Protection Act claim
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—N.D. Cal.: Baked goods misleading labeling claims adequately pled
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—N.D. Cal.: Misleading product-packaging allegations failed to meet heightened pleading requirements
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC seeks comment on Polypore’s application to divest Microporous, (Sep 27, 2013)

    Organizations Mentioned:Microporous Products, L.P. | Polypore International, Inc. | Seven Mile Capital Partners

    By Tobias J. Gillett, J.D., LL.M.

    The FTC has announced it is seeking comment on an application by Polypore International, Inc. to divest all stock and assets related to Microporous Products, L.P., a company it acquired in February 2008, to Seven Mile Capital Partners, in order to co ...

    By Tobias J. Gillett, J.D., LL.M.

    The FTC has announced it is seeking comment on an application by Polypore International, Inc. to divest all stock and assets related to Microporous Products, L.P., a company it acquired in February 2008, to Seven Mile Capital Partners, in order to comply with an FTC order that found the acquisition to be anticompetitive and required Polypore to sell Microporous to an FTC-approved buyer (In the matter of Polypore International, Inc., FTC File No.: 081 0131).

    A September 9, 2008, FTC administrative complaint charged that the acquisition had resulted in decreased competition and higher prices in the North American deep-cycle, motive, automotive, and uninterruptible power supply stationary markets for battery separators for flooded lead acid batteries. On February 22, 2010, following an administrative trial, Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell found the acquisition to be anticompetitive, and that complete divestiture of Microporous’ assets was required to remedy the effects of the acquisition and to restore competition.

    On November 5, 2010, a unanimous decision of the Commission upheld the ALJ’s initial decision, concluding that the acquisition was anticompetitive in the deep-cycle, motive, and automotive markets, but not in the uninterruptible power supply stationary market. The Commission’s final order required Polypore to divest the assets it acquired to an FTC-approved buyer within six months after the divestiture provisions became final. On July 11, 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals in Atlanta affirmed the FTC’s decision and order, including the divestiture provisions (Polypore International Inc. v. FTC, 686 F.3d 1208, 2012-1 Trade Cases ¶77,970). On June 24, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court denied Polypore’s petition for certiorari.

    Polypore’s application contends that Seven Mile Capital is a well-qualified buyer capable of and willing to operate Microporous as an independent and effective competitor. The application asserts that the proposed divestiture of Microporous to Seven Mile Capital would fully restore competition and achieve the remedial purposes of the FTC’s order.

    Public comments on the application may be submitted until October 28, 2013. Written comments can be mailed to: FTC Office of the Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 20580, or submitted electronically here.

    Companies: Polypore International, Inc.; Microporous Products, L.P.; Seven Mile Capital Partners

    News: Antitrust FederalTradeCommissionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use