Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—E.D. Pa.: Cephalon precluded from arguing strength of patent in FTC “pay-for-delay” suit
    • ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS NEWS: Combination of fixed base operators conditioned in Scottsdale airport divestitures
    • ADVERTISING—N.D. Cal.: Clorox avoids subclass certification in cat litter ad case
    • ADVERTISING—W.D. Pa.: Zoning ordinance restricting billboard use survives constitutional challenge
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Davis Vision alleged to monopolize manufacture of prescription eyeglass lenses
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC, DOJ extend comment period on Conditional Pricing Practices Workshop
    • ANTITRUST—S.D. N.Y.: Hotel developer failed to state antitrust, RICO claims against Marriott over employee union
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION NEWS: McDonald’s vows fight against NLRB’s ‘joint employer’ decision
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—D.N.J.: Days Inn franchisee loses hotel, must pay franchisor $150K
    • RICO—9th Cir.: Real estate developers fail to show “property interest,” lack RICO standing
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC, DOJ extend comment period on Conditional Pricing Practices Workshop, (Jul 30, 2014)

    Organizations Mentioned:U.S. Department of Justice

    By Greg Hammond, J.D.

    The FTC and U.S. Department of Justice have extended the comment period for their June 23, 2014 workshop discussing the economic and policy implications of conditional pricing practices. Public comments may now be submitted through September 22, 2014 ...

    By Greg Hammond, J.D.

    The FTC and U.S. Department of Justice have extended the comment period for their June 23, 2014 workshop discussing the economic and policy implications of conditional pricing practices. Public comments may now be submitted through September 22, 2014.

    The workshop, which was comprised of presentations and roundtable discussions, concentrated on “practices in which prices are explicitly or effectively contingent on commitments to purchase or sell a specified share or volume of a single product or a mix of multiple products.” Examples of conditional pricing practices include loyalty or bundled pricing. Workshop participants evaluated theoretical and empirical developments in the economic understanding of conditional pricing practices; considered developments in applicable case law; and discussed proper treatment of these practices under applicable antitrust laws.

    “In many instances, conditional pricing practices save consumers money,” stated Assistant Attorney General Bill Baer in his opening remarks to workshop participants. “Most of us benefit from loyalty and bundled pricing in the retail setting.” Examples of beneficial conditional pricing practices include coffee cards that reward consumers for their loyalty with a free drink, or bundled pricing at fast food restaurants, where set meals are cheaper than purchasing the same items individually. “These are not the types of conditional pricing we worry about,” Baer commented. Rather, concerns arise “when a monopolist uses loyalty or bundled pricing to restrict competition and maintain its market power within a supply chain.”

    Videos of the workshop and panelist slide presentations are available for public viewing here. Interested parties may submit public comments online through September 22, 2014.

    News: Antitrust AntitrustDivisionNews FederalTradeCommissionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use