Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—Acting Antitrust Chief to Step Down
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC Closes Investigation Into Proposed Acquisition of Alaska’s Natural Gas Production, Transmission, and Storage Assets
    • ANTITRUST—NDCal: LCD Panel Purchasers Alleging Price Fixing Conspiracy Show Participation by Some Nonparties, but Not by Others.
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION—MDFla: Factual Issues Surrounding Enrollment in Payday Loan Service, Discount Clubs Preclude Summary Judgment in FTC Suit
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—DNeb: Omaha Mover Preliminarily Barred from Using Marks Similar to Nationwide Franchisor’s TWO MEN AND A TRUCK Mark
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—WDTex: Wal-Mart Not Liable for Injuries to Store Employee, Had No Duty Under Franchise Agreement With Store Operator
    • RICO—OreCtApp: PAC Manager Liable For Willful Violations of Injunction
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC Closes Investigation Into Proposed Acquisition of Alaska’s Natural Gas Production, Transmission, and Storage Assets, (Nov 8, 2012)

    Organizations Mentioned:ConocoPhillips

    By Jody Coultas, J.D.

    The Federal Trade Commission closed its investigation of Hilcorp Alaska LLC’s proposed acquisition of Marathon Alaska LLC’s Cook Inlet, Alaska, natural gas production, storage, and pipeline assets without taking any action, and the Comm ...

    By Jody Coultas, J.D.

    The Federal Trade Commission closed its investigation of Hilcorp Alaska LLC’s proposed acquisition of Marathon Alaska LLC’s Cook Inlet, Alaska, natural gas production, storage, and pipeline assets without taking any action, and the Commission has issued a related statement. The FTC deferred to Alaska’s resolution of this matter.

    Natural gas produced in the Cook Inlet supplies south-central Alaska, including the Anchorage metropolitan area, with all of the natural gas. Alaska consumes all Cook Inlet production except for limited liquefied natural gas exports to Asia.

    The proposed transaction raised competitive concerns because Marathon, Hilcorp, and ConocoPhillips accounted for over 90 percent of the natural gas produced in Cook Inlet and might lessen the negotiating strength of utility and industrial customers. The FTC also believed that Hilcorp would control all of the proprietary gas storage capacity in south-central Alaska and the majority of pipeline infrastructure necessary to deliver gas from the fields to the customers, which potentially could impair efforts to bolster natural gas production from sources other than Hilcorp.

    The Alaska Department of Natural Resources believes that the merger might help alleviate concerns about energy security and local energy supply shortages, especially considering the Cook Inlet natural gas fields will soon be unable to meet south-central Alaska’s year-round supply needs.

    Concerns about energy security and the competitive implications of the transaction led the Office of the Alaska Attorney General to negotiate and file a consent decree and to recommend that the merger not be challenged. The consent decree included price caps for customers over a period of five years.

    News: Antitrust

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use