Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—7th Cir.: Antitrust claims not too “feeble” to support federal jurisdiction
    • ADVERTISING—2d Cir: Damages award based on presumption of injury upheld; willful deception proven
    • ADVERTISING—C.D. Cal.: Designer’s brother preliminarily enjoined from misappropriating ads, endorsements
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: EC probe of prestige watch makers closed
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Lab equipment manufacturer allegedly imposed anticompetitive policies on sale of replacement parts to third-party service providers
    • ANTITRUST—N.D. Cal.: Best Buy properly denied protective order barring discovery of its market monitoring practices
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Mobile cramming scheme shut down after bilking consumers out of $100M
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION NEWS: McDonald’s could be liable as joint employer in employee complaints against franchisees
    • LAW FIRM NEWS: Hazel Grant to lead Fieldfisher’s privacy team
    • RICO—11th Cir.: Partnership pockets $67M despite failed racketeering claim against TD Bank
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—N.D. Cal.: Consumer must show why deceptive claims about Bromley tea should not be dismissed
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST NEWS: EC probe of prestige watch makers closed, (Jul 29, 2014)

    Organizations Mentioned:Watch & Clock Repairers' Assn.

    By Jeffrey May, J.D.

    It is unlikely that luxury/prestige watch makers violated European competition rules by withholding spare parts from independent watch repairers, the European Commission (EC) has decided. Today, the EC announced that it has closed a formal antitrust ...

    By Jeffrey May, J.D.

    It is unlikely that luxury/prestige watch makers violated European competition rules by withholding spare parts from independent watch repairers, the European Commission (EC) has decided. Today, the EC announced that it has closed a formal antitrust investigation of the unnamed watch manufacturers that was opened in August 2011.

    The EC said that it conducted a “comprehensive investigation” into allegations that the watch makers improperly discontinued the supply of spare parts to independent watch repairers who did not belong to the manufacturers' respective official networks for repair and maintenance services. The European Confederation of Watch & Clock Repairers' Association (CEAHR) had contended that the manufacturers’ refusal to deal threatened to drive independent repairers out of business in several member states.

    CEAHR first raised its complaint a decade ago. However, in 2008, the EC rejected the complaint for lack of community interest. The probe was resuscitated after the European General Court in 2010 annulled the EC's decision to reject the complaint. In deciding to close the investigation, the EC said that it took the General Court's judgment into consideration.

    The EC rejected the complaint pursuant to Article 7(2) of Regulation 773/2004. Under Article 7, the EC provides a complainant with the reasons for rejecting a complaint and gives the complainant an opportunity to respond in writing. If the complainant's timely response does not lead the Commission to a different assessment of the sufficiency of the complaint, then the Commission will reject the complaint by decision.

    Companies: Watch & Clock Repairers' Assn.

    News: Antitrust

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use