Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—Fed. Cir.: Attorney fees incurred defending patent infringement claims were proper antitrust damages
    • ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS NEWS: EC approves Staples’ acquisition of Office Depot, with conditions
    • ADVERTISING NEWS: Online ‘high schools’ are diploma mills, FTC alleges
    • ADVERTISING—10th Cir.: Neurologist unable to revive claims over health care system’s marketing materials
    • ADVERTISING—D. Utah: Dietary supplement seller’s Amazon.com review tactics could violate Lanham Act
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Australian Egg Corporation and other egg producers cleared of cartel charges
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Auto parts maker INOAC Corp. allegedly engaged in price fixing conspiracy
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION—W.D. N.Y.: Debt collection firm owner denied stay of FTC enforcement action
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—D. N.J.: Injunction barring franchisee’s operation of 7-Eleven stores denied
    • LAW FIRM NEWS: Antitrust attorney Steven Bizar joins Dechert
    • PRIVACY NEWS: Brill encourages ‘reasonable’ security by businesses handling consumer information
    • SUPREME COURT DOCKET: Recent decisions, cases, and petitions pending High Court review
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST NEWS: Australian Egg Corporation and other egg producers cleared of cartel charges, (Feb 10, 2016)

    By Michael Menzhuber, J.D., LL.M.

    The Federal Court of Australia has cleared the following defendants of charges by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) that they attempted to induce egg producers to engage in a cartel arrangement: Australian Egg Corporation Limi ...

    By Michael Menzhuber, J.D., LL.M.

    The Federal Court of Australia has cleared the following defendants of charges by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) that they attempted to induce egg producers to engage in a cartel arrangement: Australian Egg Corporation Limited (AECL); AECL’s managing director, James Kellaway; Farm Pride Foods Ltd (Farm Pride); Ironside Management Services (Twelve Oaks Poultry); and a Twelve Oaks Poultry director, Jeffrey Ironsides.

    The proceedings concerned allegations by the ACCC that AECL, Farm Pride, and Twelve Oaks Poultry attempted to induce AECL egg members to cull hens or otherwise dispose of eggs, thereby reducing the number of eggs for commercial supply in Australia. At that time, AECL, an industry corporation that collects levies from member egg producers for promotional activities and research and development activities, had between 100 and 150 egg producer members.

    The court found that, while the Commission had established that AECL, Farm Pride, and Twelve Oaks Poultry intended that egg producers should take action to correct an oversupply of eggs, the Commission did not establish that the action was intended to be pursuant to an agreement or understanding involving reciprocal obligations by competing producers.

    News: Antitrust

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use