Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY: Debt collection operation agrees to pay $3.2 million civil penalty to settle FTC charges
    • AGENCY NEWS: Bureau of Economics Director Shelanski leaves FTC; Ippolito named Acting Director
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: American Antitrust Institute urges U.S. Sentencing Commission to increase antitrust fines
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Automobile dealers allege conspiracy to fix prices of occupant safety restraint systems
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Chemical companies ask High Court to consider application of per se rule to “output reduction cartel”
    • ANTITRUST—N.D. Cal.: Bankrupt class representative in putative antitrust class action can transfer interest to trustee
    • INDUSTRY NEWS: Steven Glassman to join New York Attorney General’s Division of Economic Justice
    • PRIVACY NEWS: FTC officials defend COPPA rule changes
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—Fla. Dist. App.: Hospital liens are not covered by Florida consumer protection law
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—Iowa Sup. Ct.: Membership club sales practices held deceptive under Iowa Consumer Fraud Act
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST NEWS: American Antitrust Institute urges U.S. Sentencing Commission to increase antitrust fines, (Jul 9, 2013)

    Organizations Mentioned:American Antitrust Institute

    By Tobias J. Gillett, J.D., LL.M.

    In a July 8 letter to the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), the American Antitrust Institute (AAI) has asked the USSC to reconsider its formula for calculating penalties for antitrust offenses, potentially to at least double the current fin ...

    By Tobias J. Gillett, J.D., LL.M.

    In a July 8 letter to the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), the American Antitrust Institute (AAI) has asked the USSC to reconsider its formula for calculating penalties for antitrust offenses, potentially to at least double the current fines.

    The AAI’s letter challenges an “empirical finding” the USSC has relied on in deriving its formula for calculating the amount of fines for antitrust offenses, under which the USSC “estimate[s] that the average gain from price-fixing is 10 percent of the selling price.” That 10 percent figure is later doubled before being included in the calculation to determine the amount of an antitrust penalty. The AAI notes that it does not know “how the Commission arrived at 10 percent,” but that the USSC has “never seriously re-examined this estimate.”

    However, the AAI observes that later empirical studies have found that price fixing generally “raises prices by significantly more than 10 percent on average.” The letter cites a study of cartel overcharge estimates by John M. Connor and Robert H. Lande, “Cartels as Rational Business Strategy: Crime Pays,” 34 Cardozo L. Rev. 427 (2012), which concluded that the median overcharge for all time periods was 23 percent, and the median overcharge for price fixing ending since 2000 was 22.5 percent.

    Therefore, the AAI suggests increasing the price fixing overcharge estimate to at least 20 percent. The letter observes that this figure would double the amount of antitrust fines, provide significantly more money to the crime victim’s fund, and “lead to more nearly optimal deterrence of price fixing and other cartel behavior.”

    News: Antitrust

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use