Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—D. Ida.: Combination of Idaho’s largest health system and largest physician practice must be unwound
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: AMC theatre chain alleged to have limited competitor’s access to top movies
    • ANTITRUST—D. Colo.: Student housing operator claiming conspiracy to monopolize denied summary judgment
    • ANTITRUST—N.D. Cal.: April date set for remedy hearing in U.S. suit against Bazaarvoice
    • ANTITRUST—N.D. Ill.: Sherman Act did not apply to purchases made by foreign affiliates of a domestic company
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: FTC staff supports NACHA’s proposed rule changes
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Western Sky Financial, CashCall, and WS Funding settle New York Attorney General charges of illegal Internet loans
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION—Ill. App.: Insurance company policy covered TCPA violations
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—Me. Sup. Ct..: Auto franchise arrangement included dealer incentive program; compliance with notice requirement was mandatory
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—N.D. Cal.: Automobile dealer’s RICO claim against GM barred by statute of limitations.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST—N.D. Cal.: April date set for remedy hearing in U.S. suit against Bazaarvoice, (Jan 24, 2014)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati
    Organizations Mentioned:Alto Litigation, PC | Bazaarvoice, Inc. | Wilson Sonsini

    By Jeffrey May, J.D.

    The federal district court in San Francisco will hold a hearing on April 2, 2014, to address the remedy for Bazaarvoice, Inc.’s anticompetitive acquisition of rival PowerReviews, Inc. The court also set deadlines for the Justice Department ...

    By Jeffrey May, J.D.

    The federal district court in San Francisco will hold a hearing on April 2, 2014, to address the remedy for Bazaarvoice, Inc.’s anticompetitive acquisition of rival PowerReviews, Inc. The court also set deadlines for the Justice Department’s Proposed Final Judgment and for Bazaarvoice’s response (U.S. v. Bazaarvoice Inc., January 22, 2014, Orrick, W.).

    Earlier this month, the court ruled that Bazaarvoice’s June 2012 acquisition of PowerReviews violated Sec. 7 of the Clayton Act. The acquisition was found to have significantly increased concentration in the already highly-concentrated market for online ratings and reviews platforms (R&R), which provide an interface for consumers to rate a product online.

    In anticipation of the April hearing, the Justice Department has been ordered to file a Proposed Final Judgment, and a brief in support of its Proposed Final Judgment, by February 12, 2014. Bazaarvoice was ordered to file its opposition brief no later than March 5, 2014. Then, the government will have an additional week to file its reply.

    To supplement the record for the Final Judgment, Bazaarvoice has been asked to provide any additional information. Bazaarvoice must produce information about its customers and former PowerReviews customers. In addition, it has been asked to provide information on patents, as well as integration of PowerReviews features or functionality into any Bazaarvoice platform.

    The case is No. 13-cv-00133-WHO.

    Attorneys: Michael Domenic Bonanno, US Department of Justice. Bahram Seyedin-Noor (Alto Litigation, PC) and Daniel Paul Weick (Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati) for Bazaarvoice, Inc.

    Companies: Bazaarvoice, Inc.

    Cases: Antitrust AntitrustDivisionNews CaliforniaNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use