Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—S.D. Ohio: Magnolia Soap franchisee’s false advertising claims survive dismissal
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Contractor pleads guilty to paying over $465,000 in kickbacks
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • ANTITRUST—E.D. Pa.: ImageFIRST may proceed with counterclaims against uniform provider Cintas in messy employee poaching dispute
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: House member expands surveillance pricing probe to 10 major service companies
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • RICO—S.D.N.Y.: Sportswear companies’ claims dismissed against distribution brokers
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—Wash. App.: Homeowners’ consumer protection lawsuit dismissed for lack of public interest
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST—E.D. Pa.: ImageFIRST may proceed with counterclaims against uniform provider Cintas in messy employee poaching dispute, (Oct 28, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Baker & McKenzie LLP | Proskauer Rose LLP
    Organizations Mentioned:Cintas Corporation | ImageFIRST Healthcare Laundry Specialists, LLC

    By Justin Marcus Smith, J.D.

    It was not facially apparent, under the Noerr-Pennington doctrine, that Cintas had a legitimate petitioning purpose in suing ImageFIRST for poaching Cintas employees.

    In a Cintas Corporation lawsuit against ImageFIRST Healthcare Laundry Specialists (I ...

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use