Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—E.D. Tex.: Becton Dickinson found liable for attempted monopolization, false advertising; damages could top $340 million
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Commissioner Wright outlines FTC approach to pay-for-delay agreements, patent assertion entities in Beijing speech
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Kodak allegedly attempted to drive competitor out of Versamark ink market through anticompetitive conduct
    • ANTITRUST—D.D.C.: U.S. consent decree resolving challenge to combination of oil and gas industry service providers approved
    • ANTITRUST—N.D. Ill.: Consumer’s claims against Live Nation over “add-on” ticket pricing dismissed
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION—9th Cir.: Damage award based on defendants’ gain rather than consumers’ loss was abuse of discretion
    • INDUSTRY NEWS: Stephen Weissman named Deputy Director of FTC Bureau of Competition
    • RICO—3d Cir.: Beneficiary of defrauded estate lacked standing to bring civil RICO claim
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—D. N.J.: Consumer Fraud Act claims must allege defendant’s certainty of product failure
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST—D.D.C.: U.S. consent decree resolving challenge to combination of oil and gas industry service providers approved, (Sep 20, 2013)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
    Organizations Mentioned:Champion Technologies, Inc. | Clariant Corporation | Ecolab | Ecolab Inc. | Permian Mud Service, Inc. | Skadden Arps | U.S. Department of Justice

    By Jeffrey May, J.D.

    The federal district court in Washington, D.C. yesterday entered a consent decree resolving a Department of Justice Antitrust Division challenge to Ecolab Inc.’s acquisition of Permian Mud Service, Inc.—the parent company of Champion Te ...

    By Jeffrey May, J.D.

    The federal district court in Washington, D.C. yesterday entered a consent decree resolving a Department of Justice Antitrust Division challenge to Ecolab Inc.’s acquisition of Permian Mud Service, Inc.—the parent company of Champion Technologies Inc. and Corsicana Technologies (U.S. v. Ecolab Inc., September 19, 2013, Sullivan, E.).

    Ecolab—a provider of water, hygiene and energy technologies and services—and Permian Mud—a supplier of specialty oilfield chemistry and related services—announced the proposed transaction in October 2012.

    In April 2013, the Antitrust Division filed a complaint, alleging that Ecolab’s acquisition of Permian would combine the two leading providers of production chemical management services for deepwater oil and gas wells (deepwater PCMS) in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. At the same time, the government announced for public comment a proposed consent decree intended to settle the government’s antitrust concerns.

    The consent decree permitted the acquisition to proceed subject to an agreement to divest assets used by Permian subsidiary Champion Technologies to provide production chemical management services in the Gulf of Mexico. The consent decree identified the acquirer as Clariant Corporation. Clariant Corporation is the U.S. affiliate of Swiss-based Clariant International Ltd., the fourth largest provider of production chemical management services globally.

    The relevant divestiture assets included those used to provide deepwater production chemical management services in the Gulf, such as the patent for Champion’s best-selling production chemical in the deepwater Gulf, exclusive licenses to all other production chemicals used by Champion in the Gulf, and the option to buy Champion’s deepwater production chemical blending and distribution facility in Broussard, Louisiana, and related equipment.

    Shortly after the settlement was reached in April, Ecolab closed on the acquisition. The total transaction, including assumed debt, was valued at approximately $2.3 billion, according to the parties.

    The case is Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-00444.

    Attorneys: Katherine A. Celeste for U.S. Department of Justice. John H. Lyons (Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP) for Ecolab Inc.

    Companies: Champion Technologies, Inc.; Clariant Corporation; Ecolab Inc.; Permian Mud Service, Inc.

    Cases: Antitrust DistrictofColumbiaNews AntitrustDivisionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use