Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations
    • ANTITRUST—Cal. App.: Trial court's demurrer on bankrupt California hospital operator's state antitrust complaint reversed on appeal
    • ADVERTISING NEWS: Bayer challenges Ninth Circuit affirmation of class certifications in ‘natural’ labeling suit
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • ADVERTISING—E.D.N.Y.: Putative class action over broth protein labeling is ruled preempted by federal law
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Apple asks Supreme Court to reject contempt based on injunction’s ‘spirit’
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Senate Judiciary Committee advances Candeub’s nomination to antitrust post
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • ANTITRUST—D.D.C.: Individuals’ Wi-Fi calling antitrust claims against Samsung sent to arbitration
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST—D.D.C.: Individuals’ Wi-Fi calling antitrust claims against Samsung sent to arbitration, (Sep 24, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Holmes Pittman & Haraguchi, LLP | Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
    Organizations Mentioned:Apple | Apple, Inc. | Voip-Pal.com, Inc. | Wilmer Cutler Hale & Dorr, LLP

    By Martin A. Steinberg, J.D.

    VoIP-Pal’s claims against Apple, Alphabet, Google, and Samsung were dismissed as impermissibly duplicative under the rule against claim splitting.

    The federal district court in Washington, D.C., partly granted motions by Apple, Alphabet, Google ...

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use