Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY: U.S. auto parts cartel probe reaches interior trim products
    • ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS NEWS: EC approves acquisition of Autodis by Bain Capital
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Luxury movie theater sues Regal, AMC over alleged boycott threat
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Purported PAE opposes dismissal of its boycott, monopsonization claims against mobile device makers
    • ANTITRUST—2d Cir.: Airline ticket distributorship claims fail to allege market power, adverse effect on competition
    • ANTITRUST—2d Cir: Dismissal of collusion suit against credit card issuers upheld
    • ANTITRUST—S.D.N.Y.: Photographers unable to pursue discovery in action against NFL, AP, Getty
    • BLOG TRACKER—Noteworthy blog posts and other commentary
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: FTC amends Telemarketing Sales Rule
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—C.D. Cal.: 911 Restoration ‘cleans up’ in request for injunctive relief against former franchisees
    • PRIVACY NEWS: FTC Chairwoman Ramirez questions implications of cross-device tracking
    • PRIVACY NEWS: FTC approves new COPPA verifiable parental consent method
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—N.D. Cal.: Blood monitoring device misrepresentation claims blocked
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST—2d Cir.: Airline ticket distributorship claims fail to allege market power, adverse effect on competition, (Nov 19, 2015)

    Law Firms Mentioned:DeToffol & Associates | Skarzynski Black LLC
    Organizations Mentioned:Altour International Inc. | American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc. | American Stock Exchange, LLC | Planetarium Travel, Inc. | Skarzynski Black, LLC

    By Greg Hammond, J.D.

    The federal district court in New York City properly dismissed claims that an airline tickets supplier illegally entered into exclusive distributorship arrangements in violation of the Sherman Act, the U.S. Court of Appeals in New York City decided i ...

    By Greg Hammond, J.D.

    The federal district court in New York City properly dismissed claims that an airline tickets supplier illegally entered into exclusive distributorship arrangements in violation of the Sherman Act, the U.S. Court of Appeals in New York City decided in a summary order. In affirming the lower court’s dismissal, the appellate court concluded that the plaintiff failed to allege an actual adverse effect on competition or sufficient market power to adversely affect competition (Planetarium Travel, Inc. v. Altour International Inc., November 19, 2015, per curiam).

    Planetarium Travel, Inc. a former franchisee of American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc., filed suit against Altour International Inc., alleging that Altour engaged in an anticompetitive scheme to drive Planetarium out of Amex’s franchise network. This, according to Planetarium, amounted to an illegal exclusive distributorship in violation of the Sherman Act. The district court dismissed the claims and Planetarium appealed.

    Antitrust injury. The appellate court affirmed the dismissal order, finding first that Planetarium failed to allege an actual adverse effect on competition. In particular, the court noted that exclusive distributorship arrangements are presumptively legal, but Planetarium failed to demonstrate how the arrangement in the instant action would impair competition for the sale of first class and business class airline tickets.

    Market power. Planetarium also failed to sufficiently allege market power, the court concluded, noting that the complaint, at most, demonstrated that Altour is the thirteenth largest travel agency in the United States and American Express Travel was only recouping 9 percent of travel spending from its card members. These allegations, according to the court, gave no indication that the alleged market share gives rise to market power.

    The case is No. 15-1161.

    Attorneys: David DeToffol (DeToffol & Associates) for Planetarium Travel, Inc. Evan Shapiro (Skarzynski Black LLC) for Altour International Inc.

    Companies: Planetarium Travel, Inc.; Altour International Inc.

    Cases: Antitrust FranchisingDistribution ConnecticutNews NewYorkNews VermontNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use