Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—E.D. Mich.: Noncompete agreement in airport concession joint venture was not an unreasonable restraint of trade
    • ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS NEWS: EC approves acquisition of Stemcor by Apollo
    • ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS NEWS: U.K. competition authority asks EC to investigate airline passenger service systems merger
    • ADVERTISING NEWS: West Virginia auto dealer to pay $80,000 to settle FTC charges of deceptive advertising
    • ADVERTISING—D. Colo.: General Steel may be liable for pay-per-click false advertising
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Pharmaceutical companies delayed entry of generic enoxaparin, complaint alleges
    • ANTITRUST—C.D. Cal.: Discovery in boxing promoter monopolization suit gets time-out
    • ANTITRUST—D. Colo.: Lenox counsel sanctioned for noncompliance with discovery order in bone mill antitrust action
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: FTC returns money to online payday loan applicants whose bank accounts were debited without their consent
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: FTC to host workshop to examine advertising for OTC homeopathic products
    • JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS—W.D. Mo.: Recent federal judicial appointments
    • LAW FIRM NEWS: Deputy Attorney General Harlan Levy returns to Boies, Schiller & Flexner
    • RICO—5th Cir.: Evidence supporting existence of RICO enterprise, causation and damages insures Allstate’s recovery
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—N.D. Cal.: eBay settles recurring listing fee suit for $6.4M
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ADVERTISING NEWS: West Virginia auto dealer to pay $80,000 to settle FTC charges of deceptive advertising, (Sep 18, 2015)

    By Michael Menzhuber, J.D., LL.M.

    Ramey Motors Inc., a West Virginia auto dealer, has agreed to pay an $80,000 civil penalty to settle FTC charges that it violated the terms of a 2012 consent order with the FTC that barred it from deceptively advertising the cost of buying or leasing ...

    By Michael Menzhuber, J.D., LL.M.

    Ramey Motors Inc., a West Virginia auto dealer, has agreed to pay an $80,000 civil penalty to settle FTC charges that it violated the terms of a 2012 consent order with the FTC that barred it from deceptively advertising the cost of buying or leasing cars, the agency announced today.

    The civil penalty settlement resolves charges that Ramey Motors’ ads violated the consent order by concealing important terms of sale and lease offers, such as a required down payment, and failing to make credit disclosures clearly and conspicuously, as required by federal law; and prohibits Ramey Motors from violating the 2012 order.

    The stipulated civil penalty order was entered by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, on September 9.

    News: ConsumerProtection Advertising FederalTradeCommissionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use