Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY: Apple seeks Supreme Court ruling on eBook price-fixing case
    • ADVERTISING NEWS: Vision improvement app marketer settles deceptive marketing claims
    • ADVERTISING—2d Cir: Staples unable to shred consumer’s deceptive practices claims over extended service plan coverage
    • ADVERTISING—D. Mass.: Sterling Jewelry shines in gemstone treatment and special care case
    • ADVERTISING—D. Utah: Assignment of publicity rights to non-party precluded standing to assert those rights
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC staff addresses competitive effects of New York energy reform
    • BLOG TRACKER—Noteworthy blog posts and other commentary
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—S.D. Ind.: Former home care franchisee not enjoined from operating home health agency
    • INDUSTRY NEWS: Roxann Henry named chair of ABA Section of Antitrust Law
    • LAW FIRM NEWS: Greenberg Traurig nabs antitrust attorney Victor Manuel Frías
    • PRIVACY NEWS: Twitter charged with monitoring users’ private Direct Messages without consent
    • RICO—S.D.N.Y.: Municipalities’ racketeering claims time-barred in residential development suit
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ADVERTISING NEWS: Vision improvement app marketer settles deceptive marketing claims, (Sep 17, 2015)

    By Jody Coultas, J.D.

    Marketers of a software application agreed to settle FTC deceptive advertising charges concerning its Ultimeyes vision improvement app.

    Carrot Neurotechnology, Inc. advertised and sold Ultimeyes on the company’s website and through third-party ...

    By Jody Coultas, J.D.

    Marketers of a software application agreed to settle FTC deceptive advertising charges concerning its Ultimeyes vision improvement app.

    Carrot Neurotechnology, Inc. advertised and sold Ultimeyes on the company’s website and through third-party app stores including the Apple App Store and Google Play Store, claiming it is “scientifically shown to improve vision,” the FTC’s complaint alleges. The app is based on a series of visual exercises related to reading speed, contrast sensitivity, and low light conditions among other elements.

    Carrot also claimed that the app, which sells for between $5.99 and $9.99, would “Turn Back The Clock On Your Vision” and that users would benefit from “comprehensive vision improvement” eliminating the need for glasses and contact lenses.

    The ads further claimed that studies proved Ultimeyes works. However, the FTC alleged that the studies and other “scientific research” did not prove Ultimeyes improves vision. The marketers also failed to disclose the tester’s affiliation with the company.

    Carrot and its owners are required under the settlement to have competent and reliable scientific evidence before making claims regarding the health benefits, performance, efficacy, safety, or side effects of any product or service. The proposed order also prohibits the marketers from misrepresenting any scientific research, and it requires them to clearly disclose any connections with anyone conducting or participating in scientific research they cite as substantiation for their claims, and with anyone endorsing their products. Lastly, Carrot and its co-owners have agreed to disgorge $150,000.

    News: Advertising FederalTradeCommissionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use