Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY: Canadian Pacific Railway ends efforts to merge with Norfolk Southern
    • ADVERTISING NEWS: Philip Morris wins Marlboro Lights marketing class action jury trial
    • ADVERTISING—9th Cir.: Rulings that class plaintiffs lacked standing, future injury upheld
    • ADVERTISING—N.D. Cal.: Consumer protection action over computer processing chip fails
    • AGENCY NEWS: It’s Official! Bill Baer to serve as Acting Associate Attorney General
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC Bureau of Competition issues Spring 2016 report
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Mitsubishi allegedly used exclusive agreements to suppress competition in Mexican solar sea salt market
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—W.D. Wash.: Franchisor waived right to arbitration
    • RICO—D.N.J.: Mortgage servicer precluded from using filed-rate doctrine to bar claims
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ADVERTISING NEWS: Philip Morris wins Marlboro Lights marketing class action jury trial, (Apr 11, 2016)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Tool, PLLC | Korein Tillery | Lewis Rice & Fingersh | Newman Bronson & Wallis | Smoger & Associates, P.C. | Swedlow & Associates
    Organizations Mentioned:Altria Group | Cohen Milstein Hausfeld & Toll, PLLC | Haar & Woods, LLP | Korein Tillery, LLC | Lewis Rice, LLC | Philip Morris Companies, Inc. | Winston & Strawn, LLP

    By Linda O’Brien, J.D., LL.M.

    On April 7, a jury in the Missouri Circuit Court in St. Louis returned a verdict in favor of tobacco manufacturer Philip Morris, rejecting claims by cigarette consumers that the company made misrepresentations in the marketing of its “light&#x ...

    By Linda O’Brien, J.D., LL.M.

    On April 7, a jury in the Missouri Circuit Court in St. Louis returned a verdict in favor of tobacco manufacturer Philip Morris, rejecting claims by cigarette consumers that the company made misrepresentations in the marketing of its “light” cigarettes (Craft v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc., Case No. 002-00406-02).

    In February 2000, a group of consumers filed suit against Philip Morris Companies, Inc., alleging that the company packaged and sold its Marlboro Lights cigarettes as “light” and represented having decreased tar and nicotine. The consumers claimed that Philip Morris falsely advertised that the cigarettes delivered lower tar and nicotine, but failed to disclose that Lights (1) contained ventilation holes that diluted the tar and nicotine per puff; (2) failed to disclose that it intentionally manipulated the design and content of Lights in order to maximize nicotine delivery; (3) failed to disclose that it intended to fool the machine tests with these design changes; and (4) failed to disclose that the design changes increased the harmful effects of tar. The complaint alleged violations of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act.

    In a unanimous judgment, the jury found in favor of Philip Morris, rejecting the consumers’ claims for compensatory and punitive damages.

    “The jury correctly rejected plaintiffs’ allegations of misrepresentation and damages,” said Murray Garnick, Altria Client Services senior vice president and associate general counsel, in a press release issued by Philip Morris’ parent company, Altria Group, Inc. “Over the years, we have been very successful in defending these cases on a variety of legal grounds.”

    Attorneys: Mark I. Bronson (Newman Bronson & Wallis), Michael D. Hausfeld (Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Tool, PLLC), Stephen M. Tillery (Korein Tillery), Gerson H. Smoger (Smoger & Associates, P.C.), and Stephen A. Swedlow (Swedlow & Associates) for Dayna Craft. Barry Short (Lewis Rice & Fingersh), Kevin J. Narko (Winston & Strawn, LLP), and Robert T. Haar (Haar & Woods, LLP) for Philip Morris Companies, Inc.

    Companies: Philip Morris Companies, Inc.

    News: Advertising StateUnfairTradePractices MissouriNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use