Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—RBS Resolves U.S., U.K. Charges over Role in LIBOR Rate Rigging Scheme
    • ADVERTISING NEWS: Google’s Display of Sponsored Links Not Deceptive, High Court of Australia Holds
    • ADVERTISING—NDOkla: Wrap Maker’s False Depiction of Competitor’s Product as Its Own Brand Violates Federal, Oklahoma Trade Laws
    • ANTITRUST—EDMich: Statute of Limitations Bars Claims Challenging Acquisition, Post-Acquisition Conduct
    • ANTITRUST—NDIll: Developer's Antitrust Claims over Stalled Shopping Center Dismissed
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION—CalCtApp: Defective Motor Home Purchaser Could Sue Lender under FTC Holder Rule, but Most Claims Fail
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—DMd: Hotel Franchisor Choice Was Entitled to Confirmation of Arbitrator’s Award Against Terminated Franchisees
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—NDIowa: Federal Arbitration Act Preempts Iowa Law Restricting Out-of-State Arbitration
    • INDUSTRY NEWS: Wendy Norman, former Antitrust Division Prosecutor, to Join GeyerGorey LLP
    • PRIVACY—MoCtApp: Claimed Lack of Knowledge of TCPA Violation Precluded Summary Judgment as to Corporate Officer’s Personal Liability for Fax Ad
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—DNJ: Class Certification Denied in Litigation Against Prudential Over Failure to Reveal Reason for Premium Increases on Closed Insurance Block
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ADVERTISING NEWS: Google’s Display of Sponsored Links Not Deceptive, High Court of Australia Holds, (Feb 6, 2013)

    Organizations Mentioned:Google Inc.

    By William Zale, J.D.

    Google did not engage in misleading or deceptive conduct under Australia’s Trade Practices Act by publishing or displaying sponsored links—a form of advertisement created by, or at the direction of, advertisers willing to pay Google for ...

    By William Zale, J.D.

    Google did not engage in misleading or deceptive conduct under Australia’s Trade Practices Act by publishing or displaying sponsored links—a form of advertisement created by, or at the direction of, advertisers willing to pay Google for advertising text which directs users to a web site of the advertiser's choosing, the High Court of Australia has ruled (Google Inc. v. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, February 6, 2013; summary from court website).

    The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission claimed that sponsored links displayed by the Google search engine between 2005 and 2008 conveyed misleading and deceptive representations, and that, by publishing or displaying those search results, Google engaged in conduct in contravention of Section 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974.

    The issue was whether Google (as distinct from the advertisers to whom the sponsored links belonged) engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct by publishing or displaying the sponsored links. Google did not author the sponsored links; it merely published or displayed, without adoption or endorsement, misleading representations made by advertisers, the court observed. Ordinary and reasonable users would have understood the sponsored links to be statements made by advertisers which Google had not endorsed, and was merely passing on for what they were worth, according to the court.

    Companies: Google Inc.

    News: Advertising

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use