Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—C.D. Cal.: Cosmetic surgeon alleges new wrinkle in antitrust claims against Botox maker
    • ADVERTISING NEWS: FTC closes investigation into Wal-Mart country-of-origin claims
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: EC imposes €116 million fine on optical disc drive suppliers in cartel settlement
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Grocers charge potato cooperatives, growers with price fixing conspiracy
    • ANTITRUST—N.D. Ill.: $103M released to class members in steel price fixing suit
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: FTC testifies on efforts to combat technical support scams
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: FTC to host debt collection dialogue in Atlanta
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—W.D. Tex.: Kia dealer drives on with competitor false license application claims
    • LAW FIRM NEWS: Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutros joins Seyfarth Shaw
    • PRIVACY—5th Cir.: Dish Network’s unplayed voice system calls did not violate TCPA
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ADVERTISING NEWS: FTC closes investigation into Wal-Mart country-of-origin claims, (Oct 21, 2015)

    Organizations Mentioned:Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

    By Greg Hammond, J.D.

    The FTC has decided not to pursue its investigation into Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., concerning outdated country-of-origin information on the retail corporation’s website and the “clarity and conspicuousness” of disclosures on “ ...

    By Greg Hammond, J.D.

    The FTC has decided not to pursue its investigation into Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., concerning outdated country-of-origin information on the retail corporation’s website and the “clarity and conspicuousness” of disclosures on “Made in USA” logos used in the company’s Investing in American Jobs Program.

    In the FTC’s letter to Wal-Mart, the Commission identified the steps the company took to prevent consumer deception, including: (1) removing “Made in USA” logos from product listings; (2) removing country-of-origin information on product specifications, except for information required by law; (3) removing U.S.-origin claims appearing on product descriptions or titles; (4) implementing a procedure to flag and remove new U.S.-origin claims made in ad copy; and (5) establishing new “Made in USA” logos for products relating to the Investing in American Jobs Program, containing larger disclosures on the percentage of U.S. content contained in the product and that the origin claim is “self-certified” by a supplying factory.

    Commission staff concluded that, based on Wal-Mart’s actions and other factors, the Commission will not pursue its investigation. The FTC noted, however, that its action not to pursue the investigation does not mean there was no violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act, and it reserved its right to take further action in the future.

    Companies: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

    News: Advertising ConsumerProtection FederalTradeCommissionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use