Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • ANTITRUST—D. Conn.: States win preliminary approval of $400M Sandoz generic drug price-fixing settlement
    • ADVERTISING—9th Cir.: Action challenging Tesla full-self driving representations did not have clear path to class certification
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • ADVERTISING—N.D. Tex.: Lanham Act claims in iron supplement dispute trimmed
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • ANTITRUST NEWS—N.D. Cal.: Court denies $85 million fee request for consumers’ counsel in Google Play Store MDL
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • ANTITRUST—M.D. Tenn.: Final approval awarded to $359.9 million in RealPage rent-fixing litigation settlements
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • RICO—W.D. Wash.: Lawsuit against Costco over ‘100% de Agave’ tequila labeling dismissed
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ADVERTISING—9th Cir.: Action challenging Tesla full-self driving representations did not have clear path to class certification, (Oct 19, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP | Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, LLP
    Organizations Mentioned:Tesla, Inc.

    By Justin Marcus Smith, J.D.

    Common questions concerning class members’ exposure to the Tesla hardware statement and the applicability of the limitations defenses did not predominate over individualized questions, and the district court erred when it concluded otherwise.

    C ...

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use