Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—7th Cir.: Text messaging case a lesson in distinguishing between express and tacit collusion
    • ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS NEWS: Divestiture period extended in automotive supplier tie-up
    • ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS NEWS: EC opens investigation of Danish telecom merger
    • ADVERTISING NEWS: Amazon sues companies allegedly offering fake 5-star reviews
    • ADVERTISING NEWS: Comcast succeeds in challenge of DirecTV’s Rob Lowe ads
    • ADVERTISING—N.D. Cal.: “Sunflower Dream” consumer proceeds with “All Natural” misbranding claims
    • ADVERTISING—S.D. Ohio: Nursing home’s false ad dispute did not meet amount-in-controversy requirement
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Retailers allege reverse payment agreements suppressed competition for acne drug Solodyn
    • BLOG TRACKER—Noteworthy blog posts and other commentary
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION—N.D. Ill.: Court declines to modify prior ruling in “junk fax” case brought under TCPA
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—2d Cir.: Hilton subsidiary properly terminated Hampton Inn franchise agreement
    • FRANCHISING AND DISTRIBUTION—N.D. Ill.: Challenge to non-compete agreements signed by employees of Jimmy John’s franchises fail
    • PRIVACY NEWS: AT&T to pay $25M to settle FCC data breach investigation
    • WORTH NOTING—Other Antitrust and Trade Regulation developments
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS NEWS: Divestiture period extended in automotive supplier tie-up, (Apr 9, 2015)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP | Latham & Watkins LLP
    Organizations Mentioned:Continental AG | Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, LLP | Latham & Watkins, LLP | U.S. Department of Justice | Veyance Technologies, Inc.

    By Jeffrey May, J.D.

    The U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division has extended for 30 days the deadline for Continental AG to divest the North American commercial vehicle air springs business of Veyance Technologies, Inc. The divestiture was required by the terms of ...

    By Jeffrey May, J.D.

    The U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division has extended for 30 days the deadline for Continental AG to divest the North American commercial vehicle air springs business of Veyance Technologies, Inc. The divestiture was required by the terms of a consent decree settling U.S. competition concerns that Germany-based automotive supplier/tire manufacturer Continental's acquisition of Veyance would have harmed competition by reducing the number of suppliers of air springs to North American commercial vehicle manufacturers from three to two. Under the Notice of Extension of Time filed with the federal district court in Washington, D.C. on April 6, Continental has until at least May 6 to complete the divestiture (U.S. v. Continental AG, Case No. 1:14-cv-02087-RBW).

    The divestiture requirement was intended to provide the acquirer of the divested assets with the ability to develop, manufacture, and sell commercial vehicle air springs to customers in North America in competition with Continental. Commercial vehicle air springs are rubber components used in trucks, trailers, and buses to provide stability to the suspension system, keep the tires in contact with the road, and provide comfort and reduced driver fatigue in cabins and seats.

    Under the consent decree, which was approved on March 30, Continental had five calendar days after notice of the entry of the final judgment to divest the assets. The government has the authority to approve an extension of the divestiture period for up to 60 days. The divestiture assets include Veyance's manufacturing facility and its assembly facility, both located in San Luis Potosi, Mexico, and its research and development, engineering and testing operations, and administration assets located in Ohio at the company's “Fairlawn Facility”, which is also Veyance’s world headquarters

    In the event that defendants do not accomplish the divestiture within the prescribed period, the court is authorized to appoint a trustee selected by the government to complete the sale.

    Attorneys: Suzanne Morris for U.S. Department of Justice. Bruce McColluch (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP) for Continental AG. E. Marcellus Williamson (Latham & Watkins LLP) for Veyance Technologies, Inc.

    Companies: Continental AG; Veyance Technologies, Inc.

    News: AcquisitionsMergers Antitrust AntitrustDivisionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use