Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY: FTC challenges Steris Corp.’s $1.9B acquisition of Synergy Health
    • ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS NEWS: Canada Competition Bureau seeks comments on new Pre-Merger Notification Interpretation Guideline
    • ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS NEWS: EC clears Advent’s acquisition of Southeast Europe banking network
    • ADVERTISING—C.D. Cal.: False advertising claims against packaging product manufacturer dismissed
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Consumers allege monopoly, anticompetitive prices in cargo shipping market
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC should seek to eliminate competitor control of market entry: Ohlhausen
    • ANTITRUST—Tex. Sup. Ct.: Medical privileges mostly inapplicable in heart surgeon’s monopolization suit
    • ANTITRUST—W.D. Va.: Lack of relevant markets dooms anticompetitive settlement claims
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—E.D. N.C: Decision allowing wrongful termination claim to proceed not reconsidered
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—D. Conn.: CUTPA claim alleging only medical negligence could not be maintained
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS NEWS: Canada Competition Bureau seeks comments on new Pre-Merger Notification Interpretation Guideline, (May 29, 2015)

    By Michael Menzhuber, J.D., LL.M.

    A draft version of Pre-Merger Notification Interpretation Guideline No. 16: Definition of "Goods" (Paragraph 111(a) of the Canada Competition Act) has been released for comment by the Canada Competition Bureau. The intent of this new guideline is to ...

    By Michael Menzhuber, J.D., LL.M.

    A draft version of Pre-Merger Notification Interpretation Guideline No. 16: Definition of "Goods" (Paragraph 111(a) of the Canada Competition Act) has been released for comment by the Canada Competition Bureau. The intent of this new guideline is to clarify the interpretation of the word "goods," as used in paragraph 111(a) of the Act, and to assist businesses in determining whether a proposed acquisition of loans, mortgages or receivables must be reported to the Bureau.

    The issuance of this draft interpretation guideline supports the Bureau’s Action Plan on Transparency, the aim of which is to promote the development of a more cost-effective, efficient and responsive agency, while providing Canadians with more opportunities to learn about the Bureau’s work.

    Interested parties are invited to provide their views on the draft version of Pre-Merger Notification Interpretation Guideline No. 16: Definition of "Goods" by email, fax or regular mail, no later than July 28, 2015. Comments may be sent to:

    Merger Notification Unit
    Mergers and Monopolistic Practices Branch
    Competition Bureau
    50 Victoria Street
    Gatineau, Quebec
    K1A 0C9
    Fax: 819-953-6169
    E-mail: mergernotification@cb-bc.gc.ca

    Responses will be posted on the Bureau’s website, unless they are specifically requested to be kept confidential.

    News: AcquisitionsMergers Antitrust

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use