Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up
- INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS—2d Cir.: Pregnancy crisis center’s challenge to abortion-related employment law partially revived
- CLASS ACTIONS—D. Colo.: Au pairs’ claims of forced labor, human trafficking, against host family not precluded by settlement
- CONTRACT CLAIMS—7th Cir.: Employee bound by change in commission structure since compensation change was prospective
- DISCHARGE—N.D. Tex.: Employee fired following complaint about coworkers’ in-office smoking and vaping proceeds with some claims
- DISCRIMINATION—AGE—S.D. Ohio: Discharged 63-year-old officer admittedly committed several policy violations; denied trial on ADEA claims
- EXPERT INSIGHTS—7 Ways to Prevent ‘Resenteeism’ and Promote a Positive Workplace Culture
- EXPERT INSIGHTS—What Does The Supreme Court's Decision Not To Review The Standard For Attorney-Client Privilege Mean For Employers?
- FEDERAL REGULATIONS—DOL announces final rule on Adverse Effect Wage Rate Methodology for H-2A workers in non-range occupations
- HOUSE NEWS—Committee on Rules of U.S. House of Representatives to discuss resolution disapproving DOL rule on ESG
- LABOR—NLRB WEEKLY SUMMARY—Weekly summary of NLRB decisions
- LABOR—UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES—E.D. Mich.: Starbucks must offer reinstatement to employee who was ‘face of the Michigan campaign’
- ON THE LABOR FRONT—The President’s State of the Union comment on employees’ right to form a union: Exhorting support for the PRO Act
- OSHA NEWS—$1.3M in penalties proposed by DOL after employees exposed to workplace hazards
- STATE-LAW CLAIMS—8th Cir.: District court erred in applying California law to interpret employment contacts; agreements had Minnesota choice-of-law clause
- WHISTLEBLOWERS—M.D. Fla.: First to file rule barred physician’s FCA complaint
© 2023 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.