Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up
- PENSION AND BENEFIT PLANS—9th Cir.: Media company could not be assessed partial withdrawal liability following complete withdrawal
- DISCRIMINATION—PAY—N.D. Oh.: Head coach for university field hockey team advances suit over higher paid male coaches
- DISCRIMINATION—PREGNANCY—N.D. Ala.: Manufacturing employee fired for absences during high-risk pregnancy takes claims to trial
- DOJ NEWS—Two defendants in H-2A forced labor racketeering scheme net three-plus years in prison
- EXPERT INSIGHTS—An employers’ 3-step plan to comply with San Francisco’s new permanent Public Health Emergency Leave Ordinance
- EXPERT INSIGHTS—Pay audits: Factors employers should consider to maintain and protect privileges
- OFCCP NEWS—Updated ‘Know Your Rights’ poster replaces ‘EEO is the Law’ and its supplement
- PROCEDURE—N.D. Cal.: Federal court exercises jurisdiction over state-law claims that arose under CBA and were preempted by LMRA § 301
- REPORTS—Microsoft making progress toward diversity, representation goals
- RETALIATION—S.D.N.Y.: Jury to decide if employee was fired over cancer-related leave requests and bias complaints
- STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES—Future Ready Lawyer webinar looks at prevalent trends, new technology, and challenges facing legal industry
- TRADE SECRETS—E. D. Pa.: Employer’s claims against employee for tortious interference and misappropriate of trade secrets under PUTSA survive dismissal
© 2023 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.