Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up
- PENSION AND BENEFIT PLANS—9th Cir.: District court erred in ruling that guidelines for determining benefits coverage improperly deviated from GASC
- DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—N.D. Cal.: Hospital employee’s ADA suit for refusing COVID vaccine dismissed
- DISCRIMINATION—N.D. Tex.: Messianic Jew, criticized for wearing Tallit and Kippah, also denied COVID-related accommodations, advances claims
- DISCRIMINATION—PAY—10th Cir.: Male college coach, allegedly fired after three days, fails to revive EPA claim
- DISCRIMINATION—PAY—N.D. Ill.: Female sales reps’ high-level description of their job duties insufficient to beat motion to dismiss their claim of unequal pay
- DOJ NEWS—Justice Department announces civil monetary penalties inflation adjustments for 2023
- EXPERT INSIGHTS—Current employees may have pay transparency rights too
- EXPERT INSIGHTS—SECURE 2.0—Changes for retirement plans
- LABOR—NLRB WEEKLY SUMMARY—Weekly summary of NLRB decisions
- OSHA NEWS—DOL announces guidance expanding use of ‘instance-by-instance’ citations
- OSHA NEWS—Dollar General cited for safety failures in Florida and Alabama, proposed penalties near $400K
- OSHA NEWS—Nearly $600k in penalties proposed after workers injured, killed following safety violations
- RETALIATION—2d Cir.: Starbucks manager and pest control service workers fail to revive suit against the coffee corporation
- WAGE-HOUR—EXEMPTIONS—S.D.N.Y.: RN plausibly alleged that Anthem misclassified putative overtime class as ‘learned professionals’
- WAGE-HOUR—OVERTIME—N.D.N.Y.: Employee’s vague overtime allegations fail to nudge FLSA pay claims from conceivable to plausible
- WORTH NOTING—Recent developments involving state and local government employment
© 2023 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.