Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up
- DISCRIMINATION—7th Cir.: Employer’s honest belief that older employee with PTSD threatened others sinks her appeal
- CLASS ACTIONS—9th Cir.: Class certification reversed in wage and hour suit based on misclassification allegations by property preservation workers
- CONFERENCES—Silent epidemic of workplace violence plagues health care workers
- COVERAGE, LIABILITY—5th Cir.: Executive order does not protect company from death and injury liability lawsuits
- DISCRIMINATION—8th Cir.: Minnesota Guardian ad Litem Board successfully defends against discrimination and retaliation claims
- DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—E.D. Pa.: No evidence clinic receptionist, fired day before positive COVID test, was regarded-as disabled
- DISCRIMINATION—SEX—7th Cir.: Nurse anesthetist is unable to revive sex bias claim on appeal
- DOL NEWS—$424K in back wages, damages recovered for 108 workers from reported FLSA violations
- DOL NEWS—DHS prosecutorial discretion may be utilized to prevent immigration-related retaliation
- EEOC NEWS—$490K recovered for workers impacted by alleged genetic and race bias, retaliation, sexual harassment
- EXPERT INSIGHTS—A Short Guide to Responding to Employee Concerns About Your Organization's Actions and Its Mission, Vision, and Values
- EXPERT INSIGHTS—Supreme Court’s EPA Decision May Spell Trouble for Other Agencies: An Employer’s Perspective
- FEDERAL REGULATIONS—Pension relief coming for union workers and retirees
- PROCEDURE—D.C. Cir.: NLRB properly declined to apply judicial estoppel in instance where it would be robbed of jurisdiction
- WAGE-HOUR—WORKING TIME—9th Cir.: Three ‘hours worked’ questions regarding workers at construction site certified to California Supreme Court
© 2023 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.