Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up
- TOP STORY—5th Cir.: Evidence directly contradicting employer’s justification for employee’s termination was not sufficient, alone, to secure trial
- ARBITRATION—Cal. App.: Lower court ruling denying motion to compel arbitration reversed, insufficient prejudice to non-moving party
- DISCRIMINATION—AGE—N.D. Ohio: 66-year-old account manager RIF’d during COVID-related layoff advances bias claims
- DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—M.D. Ala.: No showing high cost of employee’s medical benefits was reason for job elimination
- DOJ NEWS—Indictment alleges milling company conspired to hide OSHA violations
- DOJ NEWS—Mother and sons convicted of 12-year forced labor conspiracy
- EXPERT INSIGHTS— Sign of the Times? New Law Protects Florida Companies from Misclassification Claims When Aiding Gig Economy Workers in Emergencies
- EXPERT INSIGHTS—Why Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) Are a Must: Confidentially Speaking
- FEDERAL REGULATIONS—DOL’s May 20 listening session on OT regs set for Midwest employers, private-sector stakeholders
- PUBLIC EMPLOYEES—D.D.C: Challenge to COVID-19 vaccine mandate for executive branch employees fails
- REPORTS—BHDAP report highlights workforce injuries in homecare sector
- RETALIATION—E.D. Wis.: Female employee terminated due to time theft, not due to her pregnancy or related FMLA leave
- WAGE-HOUR—WORKING TIME—6th Cir.: Employee’s complaint failed to offer sufficient facts to determine whether off-the-clock work was compensable
© 2023 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.