Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
    • Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967
    • Age Discrimination Act of 1975
    • Age Discrimination Claims Assistance Act of 1988
    • Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
    • Civil Rights Act of 1866--42 USC Section 1981
    • Civil Rights Act of 1866--42 USC Section 1981a
    • Civil Rights Act of 1871--42 USC Section 1983
    • Civil Rights Act of 1871--42 USC Section 1985
    • Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Awards Act of 1976--42 USC Section 1988
    • Civil Rights Act of 1964--Title VI
    • Civil Rights Act of 1964--Title VII
    • Civil Rights Act of 1991
    • Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987
    • Education Amendments of 1972--Title IX
    • Equal Pay Act of 1963
    • Executive Order 11246
    • Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
    • Federal Arbitration Act
    • Government Organization and Employees
    • Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986
    • Older Workers Benefit Protection Act of 1990
    • Policy Concerning Homosexuality in the Armed Forces--10 USC Section 654
    • Rehabilitation Act of 1973
    • Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993
    • Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994
    • US Constitution
    • Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974
    • Miscellaneous Laws
  • Articles
  • Articles

    Employment Practices Decisions Archive: 1937 - 1995, EMPLOYMENT-PRACTICES 6 EPD ¶8971, Lorenzo Hayes et al., Plaintiffs v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company et al., Defendants., (Nov. 19, 1973), (Nov. 19, 1973)

    Lorenzo Hayes et al., Plaintiffs v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company et al., Defendants.

    United States District Court, Southern District of Georgia, Savannah Division., November 19, 1973

    Title VII--Civil Rights Act of 1964

    Racial Discrimination--Railroad Industry--Court Action.

    --A race bias suit against a railroad and the unions was to proceed toward trial. Certain alleged discriminatees bringing suit were not to be dismissed from the suit nor was the railroad to get partial summary judgment.

    Back reference.-- ¶2510.15.

    Issuing rulings on pretrial motions in (DC Ga. 1968) 1 EPD ¶9936 , and motions in (DC Ga. 1968) 1 EPD ¶9953 , 46 F. R. D. 49, following denial of appeal in (CA-5 1971) 3 EPD ¶8320 , from (DC Ga. 1971) 3 EPD ¶8170 .

    Bobby L. Hill, Savannah, Georgia, and Jack Greenberg, New York, New York, for Plaintiffs.

    Adams, Adams, Brennan & Gardner, Savannah, Georgia, and James L. Highsaw, Jr., Washington, D. C., for Defendants.

    Order

    LAWRENCE, C. J.: The above action having come before the Court upon motions of the parties as described below, and briefs and arguments of counsel having been received and considered, it is ORDERED:

    1. On April 9, 1971, the Court stayed this action pending joinder of individual white employees as parties defendant (3 EPD ¶8170 ); an appeal from that order was denied by the Fifth Circuit (3 EPD ¶8320 ). Counsel for the parties herein then proceeded to trial with similar issues in English v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company, Waycross Division, Civil Action No. 691. On January 12, 1973, SCL and BRAC entered into an agreement merging Group 1 and Group 2 on a date-of-hire basis; that agreement has now been incorporated into an order of this Court dated November 16, 1973 [6 EPD ¶8970 ]. Therefore, it appears that the stay is no longer necessary; the order of April 9, 1971 is accordingly vacated.

    2. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company’s fourth motions, for limitation of back pay, are reserved for decision at or following trial.

    3. SCL’s fifth motion, for joinder of the United Transport Service Employees, is dismissed as moot, the Court having been advised that the UTSE has been merged into the defendant BRAC.

    4. SCL’s sixth motions, with respect to dismissal of parties plaintiffs, are denied in light of the Fifth Circuit’s en banc decision on rehearing in Huff v. N. D. Cass Co.,--F. 2d--, 6 EPD ¶8800 (slip op. dated September 4, 1973), it appearing that regardless of the standing or employment status of the individual the class action is, as a general rule, allowed to proceed absent compelling reasons to the contrary.

    5. SCL’s motion for partial summary judgment is denied. The motion is based on allegations that two of the plaintiffs, Lee H. Stephens and Willie Campbell, stated on deposition that their complaint stemmed from the dissolution of the Savannah Union Station Company and the consequent loss of seniority of SUSCO employees upon their assimilation into the operations of the Atlantic Coast Line and Seaboard Air [Coast] Line Railroad Companies. This motion creates a question of fact more appropriate for resolution at trial.

    6. SCL’s motion to compel answers to its second interrogatories is granted, but costs and attorneys’ fees are denied. Plaintiffs are ordered to respond fully to said interrogatories within thirty days of the date of this order, all objections thereto having been waived.

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use